From the client's space requirement to the signed lease: curate market surveys, compare proposals on net effective rent, run tours with client feedback, and track landlord-paid commissions with splits and tranches - on one record, in English and German.
One record for the work your role does every day.
Capture the occupier brief - area, headcount, budget, timing, must-haves - as a record that carries its own demand-side pipeline from brief to signature, not a note in a spreadsheet.
Assemble candidate spaces into a versioned survey per requirement, share it, and log the client's verdict per option: favorite, interested, or pass.
Every space option normalizes base rent, service charge, TI allowance, free rent, escalation and term - so best-and-final rounds compare on net effective rent, not gut feel.
Tenant-rep engagements do not move like listings. The requirement record tracks its own stages - brief, survey, touring, RFP, negotiation, LOI, execution - with tours and options attached where they happened.
Landlord-paid, split with a co-broker, shared with the house, and collected in tranches on execution and occupancy. The commission record models it instead of a side spreadsheet.
Most tenant-rep tools stop at the signature: the deal closes, and the lease itself starts life again in another system. In REPM the winning space option carries straight into an occupier lease - rent, term, break options, free rent, TI and rent commencement - so critical dates and occupancy cost are tracked from day one.
The same platform serves the landlord side, so a firm that represents tenants and markets space does not run two systems. Listings, syndication and viewings live next to requirements, surveys and options - one contact database, one property inventory, one security model.
REPM speaks the vocabulary of the German market natively: Kaltmiete and Nebenkosten, Staffel- and Indexmiete, Kündigungsfristen - in English and German on every record. US-centric tenant-rep point tools do not.
Tenant rep software is a system built around the occupier's requirement rather than a landlord's building. It holds the space requirement, the curated market survey, the space options and their proposals, the tours, the resulting lease and the landlord-paid commission on one record, so an occupier-side broker runs the whole engagement in one place instead of a landlord CRM plus spreadsheets.
A landlord CRM is organized around the asset you own and the pipeline of prospects for your vacancy. Tenant representation is the mirror image: one client requirement, many buildings owned by other people, compared on net effective rent. REPM makes the requirement the anchor record, so the demand-side pipeline (brief, survey, tours, RFP, negotiation, lease, commission) is native rather than forced into a leasing funnel.
Net effective rent is the average cost per unit of area per year across the whole term, once base rent, service charge, tenant-improvement allowance, free rent, escalation and term are normalized. Two offers with the same headline rent can differ sharply on net effective rent, so REPM computes it per space option and best-and-final rounds compare like for like.
In most markets the landlord pays the tenant rep's commission out of the transaction, so the occupier gets representation at no direct cost. REPM records the commission with its basis and rate, the co-broke and house splits down to net-to-firm, and the tranches that land on execution and on occupancy, each with an invoice status.
Yes. Every record is bilingual English and German, and REPM uses the local vocabulary (Kaltmiete, Nebenkosten, Staffel- und Indexmiete, Kündigungsfristen). It runs in your own Microsoft Dataverse tenant, so the data stays with you.
Requirement, survey, options, tours, commission and the resulting lease - on your own Microsoft tenant, in both languages.
Request a demo